Skip to content
  • Chamber Foundation
  • AMC
  • Chamber Business News
  • JOIN
  • LOGIN
Menu
  • Chamber Foundation
  • AMC
  • Chamber Business News
  • JOIN
  • LOGIN
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • Corporate Members
    • Join
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Business Agenda
    • Policy Committees
    • PAC
  • News & Resources
    • Blog
    • Press Releases
  • Events & Programs
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Calendar
    • Heritage Award
  • Chamber Foundation
  • AMC
  • Chamber Business News
  • JOIN
  • LOGIN
Menu
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • Membership Benefits
    • Corporate Members
    • Join
  • Policy & Advocacy
    • Business Agenda
    • Policy Committees
    • PAC
  • News & Resources
    • Blog
    • Press Releases
  • Events & Programs
    • Upcoming Events
    • Event Calendar
    • Heritage Award
  • Chamber Foundation
  • AMC
  • Chamber Business News
  • JOIN
  • LOGIN

Blog

Supreme Court Issues Reality Check for EPA

environment regulatory
•
July 1, 2015
•
Glenn Hamer
•
No Comment

If your social media feeds are like mine they’ve been full of cheers and jeers for recent decisions handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court. One decision that may be taking up less space on Facebook and Twitter this week is Michigan v. EPA, which the Court decided on Monday and is worth a hearty cheer.

The case centered on the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulation of mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. Under the Clean Air Act, the EPA may only impose regulations deemed “appropriate and necessary” after studying impacts to public health. In making the determination to regulate, the EPA refused to consider cost, which the Court rightly ruled was unreasonable.

In this particular case, the EPA’s own numbers are astounding. They estimated the compliance cost to power plants would be $9.6 billion a year, while the quantifiable benefits from the resulting emissions reduction would be $4 to $6 million a year. And yet, the EPA deemed cost irrelevant to their decision to regulate.

Here’s what the Court had to say to that:

EPA strayed well beyond the bounds of reasonable interpretation in concluding that cost is not a factor relevant to the appropriateness of regulating power plants.

And, my favorite line from the decision:

It is not rational, never mind “appropriate,” to impose billions of dollars in economic costs in return for a few dollars in health or environmental benefits.

This last statement delivers the true victory by issuing a reality check for out-of-control regulators. While the directive of this Administration’s EPA seems to be “regulate at any cost,” the Supremes checked that mindset by ordering, “EPA must consider cost—including cost of compliance—before deciding whether regulation is appropriate and necessary.”

This decision is a big win for power producers, but ultimately it’s small businesses and all electric power consumers who are the victors. They’re the ones who bear the burden of increased regulatory costs. Now, with a number of EPA and other agency regulations in the works, it’s great to confirm they must consider whether imposed costs are delivering meaningful public benefit in return.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NextNext
TOP

ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY
100 N 7th Ave #120
Phoenix, AZ 85007

PHONE (602) 248-4430
FAX (602) 391-2498
AZCHAMBER.COM

The Arizona Chamber is committed to ensuring economic growth and prosperity for all Arizonans. We advocate for free-market policies and work to advance Arizona as a leading player in the global economy.

© Copyright 2013-2022 Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry. All Rights Reserved.

Web Site by Esper Media

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here

Add Your Heading Text Here